I have lived both sides of this table







I have lived both sides of this table. I was the son who asked for room. Today I am the third party who sits in the middle.
And what I have learned watching business families is uncomfortable: the fight over the division of power almost never comes from ego. It comes from something worse, because it is invisible: there is no translator.
The son does not want the father's place. The father does not want to lose what he built. Both want compatible things and fight anyway, because they speak different languages: one speaks of the future, the other speaks of history.
Without that bridge, the missing structure is always the same:
• Nobody defines what is being negotiated: power or autonomy. Without that, every request sounds like a threat.
• Nobody separates the company's agenda from the family's agenda. Hurt feelings walk into the meeting with voting rights.
• Nobody records what was agreed. And an agreement that does not exist gets renegotiated every Sunday.
A well-built Board, or an advisor who knows this dynamic, does not decide for the family. It takes each person to the point they need to reach and cannot reach alone.
The cost of postponing this conversation does not show up in the income statement. It shows up in the medium term: in the stalled decision, in the family talent that leaves, in the business that ends up smaller than the surname.
If this conversation is being postponed in your company, the cost has already started. The bridge is built before the next meeting, not after the next fight. Send me a message.
Also published on LinkedIn, where the conversation continues in the comments.
Previous postThe fight did not start with a shout. It started with a polite request